Here we collect awesome macOS software in various categories. This is when viewed in both smplayer and Internet Explorer at normal (100%) size. Now we have become very big and different from the original idea. things that are round/rounded (circular object, rounded outline of text) look less round and more step-like jagged than the rounder look from Easy Gif. So the only real issue with GifyGun seems to be the more pixelated outline of objects where they meet the transparent areas (maybe because transparency was one of the newer updates), eg. Though in GifyGun it seemd to happen less when GifyGun scaled down the comp, but like I said, it's not really noticeable at normal res). Another small thing is towards the end of the anim where a coloured object appears after the previous part of the anim had been grayscale, isolated coloured pixels appear within the grayscale areas of the frame (but this is just a few and isn't really very noticable at normal res, but doesn't happen with the same anim from the other program. The only issues with Gifygun is that it doesn't let you specify a filename (sets it based on the composition name, with a number added if there is already a file with that name), but more importantly, at least for the comp of the last delivery, the edges of things, where they meet the transparent parts of the gif, look more pixelated/less anti-aliased than the output of Easy Gif Animator Pro. It is a lot more convenient to use than exporting the frames (when those exported frames aren't needed for something else) and importing into another program etc. gif should work (and show an animation) in more places than the animated png so they might find they need it but that it looks a bit noisy/artefacty when they do). Though I don't think they've actually tried it in the places they want to yet. Though the person delivery so maybe it's not a problem (so maybe the person is only going to use the other formats including the full res ones. gif look better (less noisy/artefacty) that would give more options. png so doesn't mind so much.īut if I could make the. gif and will just use the other formats including the. Maybe the person isn't planning on using the. Maybe what looks like noisy/artefacts is because of the conversion of colours from a couple of thousand used out of a 24 bit pallette to just the 256 of the. I loaded the files from After Effects png sequence into Easy Gif Animator Pro and set the transparency+background colour. I created it at 192x108 from a 1920x1080 comp, and I'm not quite sure why it looks noisy (worse than the animated. based on the recommendations (at least for now - maybe that lottie exporter might also be compatible - but I'll look at that more in future as it seems more complex). If that can look okay that seems the most compatible for everywhere eg. Hopefully the thousands to 256 colours won't be too much of an issue. gif (smaller frame size than the quicktime png). But I'll also upload a quicktime png compressed video and maybe a png sequence (maybe different frame sizes - or at least a smallish frame size for the animated png/apng) and also a. So I'll probably look at that later but for now I'll probably just deliver it as the formats previously mentioned (the person originally asked for a png so if I can find an animated png/apng format program I'll load the After Effects frames/video into that and save/export. Basically the files need to be delivered today (as well as the animation finished). I think that might be good for in future but it seems mostly about mobile devices too (not sure it would work for email newsletters on PC). My animation is using bitmapped graphics (eg.png) as well as vector (.ai) though they were originally ai., with various AE effects.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |